EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
1073

That individuals should be allowed to punish people they deem to have committed online harassment by revealing their identity online

(PRO)
WINNER!
3 points
(CON)
0 points
brandon.the.debaterbrandon.the.debater (PRO)
Hello, my name is Brandon Acosta and I will be arguing the affirmatiuon to the topic "That individuals should be allowed to punish people they deem to have committed online harassment by relaling their identity online". I would first like to clarify the organization of my argument: 
  1. Debate Organization and Rules
  2. Opening Statement
  3. Acceptance
  4. Definitions
Due to the fact of the limits in these rounds, in which there is a maximum of 8000 characters, and since my arguments will be pretty lengthy, I would like to state that all my rounds will have a Google Docs link in which, one may open it and read it thoroughly. Since the negation has provided no specific rules towards third-party writing software, I am able to do this. All links will allow people to view the file, meaning no editing is allowed, or even possible.
javascript:nicTemp();
Additionally, I was unable to finish my Works Cited, although there are some links at the end of everything that you may click on a reference.If anybody has any issues regarding this document, you may message me on EDEB8, or for preference, anybody may e-mail me to brandondebates1@gmail.com.
Thank you and I wish the best of luck to the negation!!!



Return To Top | Posted:
2016-12-18 21:24:22
| Speak Round
Cross-Examination
brandon.the.debater: Due to the fact my opponent has forfeited their rounds all my information stated in the first speech carries on. Additionally, in the next round I will be providing further explaination to my information.

Return To Top | Speak Round
brandon.the.debaterbrandon.the.debater (PRO)
Hello, this is Brandon and I remain proud to affirm the topic "That individuals should be allowed to punish people they deem to have committed online harassment by revealing their identity online". Due to the fact that my opponent has forfeited their first round all my arguments remain extended. Now, since the previous CX explained that I would explain my contentions in further detail, that is not needed. 
Return To Top | Posted:
2016-12-30 17:56:09
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
Bi0HazardBi0Hazard
Why couldn't you just post an argument rather than focus on your own specific aspects you would like to enforce?
Posted 2017-01-08 02:29:27
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2017-01-08 20:33:04
Bi0HazardJudge: Bi0Hazard    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: brandon.the.debater
2017-01-09 13:33:37
Random StrangerJudge: Random Stranger
Win awarded to: brandon.the.debater
2017-01-13 00:55:45
ultimate.debaterJudge: ultimate.debater
Win awarded to: brandon.the.debater

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 2 rounds
  • 8000 characters per round
  • Reply speeches
  • Uses cross-examination
  • Permissive Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Unrated debate
  • Time to post: 3 days
  • Time to vote: 5 days
  • Time to prepare: None
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29