EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
200

That terrorism is justifiable

(PRO)
0 points
(CON)
WINNER!
0 points
CalebfizzelCalebfizzel (PRO)
in an article named two justifications for terrorism: a moral legal response by ben saul  it states that some terroristic acts are ok as though the law forbids violence it also is willing to turn its eyes if it is against a "hitler like character"  the same article states that a brittish philosopher ted honderich states that "terrorism for human right" he claims that terrorism is the only way to free palestinians from israeli domination 

terrorism: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims (from google definitions) 

Return To Top | Posted:
2018-04-27 01:21:54
| Speak Round
MharmanMharman (CON)
The key word is that these people are innocent. They don't deserve to be terrorized for a political goal. The odds do not justify the means.
Return To Top | Posted:
2018-04-29 19:15:02
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

There are no judgements yet on this debate.

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 2 rounds
  • 4000 characters per round
  • No reply speeches
  • No cross-examination
  • Permissive Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds means forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Rated debate
  • Time to post: 3 days
  • Time to vote: 1 week
  • Time to prepare: 3 hours
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29