EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum

That marijuana should be legal

0 points
5 points

View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2015-01-03 16:11:21
adminJudge: admin    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: MikeMighty
2015-01-04 00:10:25
PinkieJudge: Pinkie    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: MikeMighty
2015-01-08 22:34:07
JohnMaynardKeynesJudge: JohnMaynardKeynes
Win awarded to: MikeMighty
2015-01-10 01:23:52
WyltedJudge: Wylted
Win awarded to: MikeMighty
2015-01-11 16:38:55
Win awarded to: MikeMighty
While neither debaters made arguments, CRNER, who is pro, had the burden of proof; con only had the burden to refute pro's arguments. As pro has made no arguments, con does not need to refute anything.
1 user rated this judgement as a vote bomb
1 comment on this judgement
..not necessary. This is a value debate where imminent harm hascto be proven by CON to win the debate. PRO moves that we legalise marijuana.. its a positive stance advocating for a positive change in the status quo. The burden is on CON to prove that this resolution only stands to harm society. As such I vote for PRO! :)
Posted 2015-01-26 19:01:35

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 2 rounds
  • 8000 characters per round
  • No reply speeches
  • No cross-examination
  • Community Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Unrated debate
  • Time to post: 2 days
  • Time to vote: 3 weeks
  • Time to prepare: None
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29