That marijuana should be legal

crner (PRO)
Round Forfeited

---

Return To Top | Posted:

2014-12-29 02:31:03

| Speak Round

MikeMighty (CON)
Round Forfeited

---

Return To Top | Posted:

2014-12-31 02:32:01

| Speak Round

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

Previous Judgments

2015-01-03 03:11:21

Judge: admin    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: MikeMighty

2015-01-03 11:10:25

Judge: Pinkie    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: MikeMighty

2015-01-08 09:34:07

Judge: JohnMaynardKeynes
Win awarded to: MikeMighty

2015-01-09 12:23:52

Judge: Wylted
Win awarded to: MikeMighty

2015-01-11 03:38:55

Judge: JDSFDSFfsa
Win awarded to: MikeMighty
Reasoning:
While neither debaters made arguments, CRNER, who is pro, had the burden of proof; con only had the burden to refute pro's arguments. As pro has made no arguments, con does not need to refute anything.

---

1 user rated this judgement as a vote bomb

1 comment on this judgement

ZeusYoda
..not necessary. This is a value debate where imminent harm hascto be proven by CON to win the debate. PRO moves that we legalise marijuana.. its a positive stance advocating for a positive change in the status quo. The burden is on CON to prove that this resolution only stands to harm society. As such I vote for PRO!

Posted 2015-01-26 06:01:35

Rules of the debate

• Text debate
• Individual debate
• 2 rounds
• 8000 characters per round
• No reply speeches
• No cross-examination
• Community Judging Standard (notes)
• Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
• Images allowed
• HTML formatting allowed
• Unrated debate
• Time to post: 2 days
• Time to vote: 3 weeks
• Time to prepare: None