That children should be allowed to work

admin (CON)
WINNER!
5 points

Debate
Comments (2)
Rules
Judging (5)

ADreamOfLiberty (PRO)
Round Forfeited

Return To Top | Posted:

2014-05-04 21:21:01

| Speak Round

admin (CON)

Three reasons to oppose this motion:

Consent - children can't understand employment contracts.
Development - detracts from normal education, replacing with health harms and other injuries.
Conditions - harder to monitor working conditions for children.

Or CDC for short. Oh, and pro hasn't met his burden of proof. The resolution is negated. ;)

Return To Top | Posted:

2014-05-04 21:25:43

| Speak Round

Cross-Examination

admin: You got anything to say?

Return To Top | Speak Round

ADreamOfLiberty (PRO)
Round Forfeited

Return To Top | Posted:

2014-05-06 21:26:01

| Speak Round

admin (CON)
Round Forfeited

Return To Top | Posted:

2014-05-07 21:26:01

| Speak Round

View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment

ADreamOfLiberty
Well I would have, but I wasn't here

Going to have to remember to unassign myself if I am not going to be checking back in a while.

Posted 2014-05-20 15:47:31

Priest of Swag
To bad liberty did not debate this. I agree voluntary work service should be brought bacl

Posted 2014-05-20 14:27:39

The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2014-05-07 23:11:23

Judge: nzlockie TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: admin
Reasoning:
Admin wins on the strength of a completely unopposed argument. This was an interesting debate, I'm sorry to see it go out like this!

Feedback:
ADOL knows what he has to do.
I actually really liked the brevity of Admin's points. I know this was largely due to the forfeited first round, but still - sometimes less words is better. Lesson learned. Thanks!

1 user rated this judgement as constructive

0 comments on this judgement

2014-05-09 03:38:08