EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
4595

Pakastani Occupation of Jammu and Kashmir is Justifiable

(PRO)
WINNER!
0 points
(CON)
0 points
TakbearsTakbears (PRO)

History of Jammu and Kashmir

Jammu and Kashmir was an independent kingdom not a part of the Britsh Raj. During the 1947 partition of India, they were given the option to.....



^ Map showing modern day division of Kashmir, between China, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan


(A) Join Pakistan

(B) Join India

(C) Become Independent


The Raj, Hari Singh, was skeptical of both option (A) and option(B). He knew that his Hindu administration wanted to go with option (A), but the vast Muslim majority would revolt if the kingdom went the course of option(B). Raj Singh, inspired by the independence of the Swiss nation, knew that the only way to keep his kindgom from collapsing was to make it an independent entity, therefore, he went with option (C).


The Raj, formulated an agreement that went to both India and Pakistan. Asking for political independence from both influencing groups. Pakistan, accepted the agreement, officially recognizing the nation of Jammu and Kashmir. India, was less accepting, denying the independence of the new state. [1] [2]


^ Hari Singh, Maharajah of Jammu and Kashmir


Shortly after the Partition diaspora, the British instigated a tribal revolt, in an attempt to resolve the conflict. The natives, quickly disposed of J/K administration, and acceded to Pakistan. The south, also was led into a revolt (suspiciously), and quickly took down Jammu governors. Hari, fearing his nation would descend into complete dissolution, called for both nations to send troops. Pakistan's British high command, refused to send troops. He appealed to India. Their stance was clear though. They would not send troops unless J/K accedes. Hari agreed, and signed the instrument of Ascension. [3] [4]

^ Instrument of Ascension, which led to J/K becoming a Indian State


Demographics

In order to make my case, I have to provide vital reasoning on why Jammu and Kashmir, is in better hands with Pakistan. Here are a few statistics......


(A) 97% of the Kashmir valley practices Islam

(B) 67% of the state is Muslim

(C) Only 29% of the state is Hindu

(D) 74% of the whole Kashmir region is Islam

(E) 24% of the population is Hindu


Division

% Area

% Population

Population

% Muslim

% Hindu

% Sikh

% Buddhist and other

Kashmir

15.73%

53.9%

5,476,970

97.16%

1.84%

0.88%

0.11%

Jammu

25.93%

43.7%

4,430,191

30.69%

65.23%

3.57%

0.51%

Ladakh

58.33%

2.3%

236,539

47.40%

6.22%

45.87%

Jammu and Kashmir

100%

100%

10,143,700

66.97%

29.63%

2.03%

1.36%


Statistics calculated from the2001 Census India District Profiles

There are roughly 1.5 million refugees from Indian Administered Kashmir in Pakistan Administered Kashmir and other parts of Pakistan.[58] An estimated 50–100,000 Kashmiri Muslims[59][60] and 150–300,000 Kashmiri Pandits have been internally displaced due to militancy.[57][61]

^ Demographics of Jammu and Kashmir


Examination


You might be asking, what do these demographics symbolize? Obviously, that Kashmir has an extreme Muslim majority. As point(A)shows, the region is 67% Islam. Now I did not directly cite terrorism, but here are a few things we learned from the 1,500,000 refugees living in Pakistan. [5]


(P1) Indian Marshall Law results in the deaths and displacement of citizens

(P2) Jammu and Kashmir is a haven for religious terrorism and jihad

(C1)Therefore, Indian presence in the region is causing net-harm


This resolution will stand, unless my opponent defeats, that this contention is not synonymous. My opponent may try to argue a ploy, that both nations are secular, but he's sorely mistaken. Its no secret that Muslims in Pakistan get more rights, freedoms, and governance designed around their beliefs. Its vice versa for India. I am not implying that either nation restricts rights from religious minorities, but have governments and laws designed to protect their respective religions. [6]


Another contention, would be the fact that neither side has moral high ground here. Both sides has not done their fair share of abuse. They equally tore up the empire on instigation of Britain. They continue to infiltrate each other. And they recklessly shoot nukes at each other, which I must say, is absolutely horrific. No joke, both sides have strategically used nukes on small targets. Audience, please note, any attempt at proving a moral high ground victory should be looked at with serious contempt. [7]

Why not Independence?

As figured, I have set this debate up like Kashmir should be independent. This would not be a wise decision. Kashmir is jammed between three nuclear powers, all of which have used extremely aggressive force at one time or another to take the region. This is essential knowledge, because it leads us to believe an independent Kashmir would be a living war zone, with it being more than likely  nuclear test ground. Therefore, the only real peace for Kashmir is in the hands of nuclear deterrence. I do not wish it like this, but this is a harsh reality. [8]

Thanks for the debate progressives, good luck!

[1] http://postcolonialstudies.emory.edu/partition-of-india/

[2] http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/partition1947_01.shtml

[3] http://www.countercurrents.org/mujtaba310111.htm

[4] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/17/Kashmir-Accession-Document-a.jpg/433px-Kashmir-Accession-Document-a.jpg

[5] http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/09/201391711186325937.html

[6] http://asiasociety.org/countries/traditions/indian-society-and-ways-living

[7] http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/INDIA935.PDF

[8] http://isreview.org/issue/83/understanding-kashmirs-struggle-independence



Return To Top | Posted:
2014-05-31 08:15:57
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
adminadmin
Seems like a couple of other things went wrong in the end, especially with your not being awarded your elo points / other stats and me not receiving a notification that you had posted. Super glad this debate happened and promise that all the bugs will be ironed out with the next big site update.
Posted 2014-06-03 09:04:37
Priest of SwagPriest of Swag
It seems my debate became a test run for your bug fixing :)
Posted 2014-05-27 21:29:37
adminadmin
Csareo, you do realize the bug is supposed to be fixed now, right? Do let me know if it isn't. I'll give you another 2 day extension.
Posted 2014-05-27 20:56:36
Priest of SwagPriest of Swag
Great
Posted 2014-05-24 11:51:14
18Karl18Karl
Good luck to all. I will be observing this debate!
Posted 2014-05-24 11:09:31
Priest of SwagPriest of Swag
I'm hoping for an invigorating debate
Posted 2014-05-21 01:09:39
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

There are no judgements yet on this debate.

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Team debate
  • 1 rounds
  • 8000 characters per round
  • Reply speeches
  • No cross-examination
  • Community Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds means forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Rated debate
  • Time to post: 3 days
  • Time to vote: 2 weeks
  • Time to prepare: None