Let's make a new economic system based on Cuba's Libreta de Abastecimiento (book supply), because you know, why not? Divide all corporations into 2 forms of shares. Power shares and standard shares. Standard shares represent 50% of a the corporation, while power shares represent the other 50%. 40% of standard shares would be divided by the proportion of employees working in the corporation, while a 10% separate dependency would be given as bonus based on job tiers. For example, if someone is a manager and someone else is a technician, the manager would collect a higher dividend from the 10% separate dependency. Workers with standard shares have no influence in company policy or decisions, and are locked and unable to be traded. Whereas power shares can be.
Power shareholders are attributed the other 50% of the wealth the corporation makes, but control 100% of the companies decisions. Power shares can be traded much like regular stock in modern day markets. If someone were to control 90% of power shares, that man would have 90% of the power in the company, but have a return of a little under 50% of the wealth the corporation makes.
Now we have to divide the economic system into two forms of currency. Fiat and commodity. Fiat currency is the entire basis of the economy, and 100% motivated by the consumers needs. If the average food bill costs 100$, then the government would control the value of the Fiat currency to match that expense. All money throughout the economic system travels back through the central bank, before being distributed to individual firms and private banking institutions.
When the money reaches the central bank, a couple things must be determined. The Fiat currency is divided into several colors, and given two values. Each color represents a different consumer token. E.G, green represents food, blue represents entertainment, red represents living expenses, ect. On the fiat currency, there are two values to the money. One based on commodity and one based on consumer needs, like already determined. For example, a bill could be worth 5$ based on consumerism and 10$ based on the commodity system.
People waiting to receive their money allocate their budget beforehand. How much do they want in food? How much do they need in expenses? Ect.
While businesses allocate what they need in trade resources. How much wool do we need for this month? What Quality? Ect.
At the central bank, the money is then converted to its individual needs. If 10,000$ in commodity value need to go to wool, then the central bank will approve the purchase.
If a man and his family need 30% in food, 20% in living expenses, and 50% for general purpose, then the central bank will approve their money to be sent containing the families specifications.
The real prize to this system is the two tiered currency. The commodity value can be used to purchase shares, perform trade transactions, and all forms of interconnected trade. Whereas the Fiat value can be used to buy food, services, and pay for expenses at a rate that helps the consumer. What are your thoughts? The thing I'm having the most trouble with is the "equity split".
Thumbs up from:
