Least Favorite Debate Category

My least favorite debates are regarding history. For example, whether or not the holocaust happened, or what the fate of Roanoke colony was. It is not because I do not like history either. I feel these debates have a different core nature. Too much speculation, and the debates usually end up being a battle over who has better evidence. Whereas if I were to debate philosophy or whether something should be legal, a source battle can be avoided.

Anyways, what are your least favorite debate categoryh.

Blackflag: My least favorite is people.

I don't care much for celebs and things.

Blackflag: My least favourite is economics, closely followed by war history type ones, the majority of which I find to be based mainly on conjecture.

nzlockie: Conjecture is in all subjects. There's just more of it in history and economics.
Economics is a social science based on speculation, and you have to argue as if you have a definite answer.
The same can be said for religion debates though.

Blackflag: Hey, you asked, I answered.

Naturally most debates involve conjecture. What I mean is that I find War debates to involve a tremendous amount of conjecture, considering that there are so many human variables involved.
I'm also not particularly interested in discussing wars as if they were sports matches - which is what I find tends to happen a lot on the internet.
I guess you could could say that they are "based on a level of conjecture that I find uninteresting."

I don't like economics because I don't really care about money or maths and I find discussing it boring. (Sorry JMK)

nzlockie: I was agreeing with you if that was not clear.