EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
2808

That radio stations should be required to play a certain percentage of native music

(PRO)
0 points
(CON)
WINNER!
5 points
Cross-Examination
2001bhu: what to do?
ButterCatx: Radios should not have to play a certain amount of any type of music. That would be a violation of freedom of speech,one of the most important freedoms given in the constitution.
ButterCatx: How are radios racist? Please explain that part further
2001bhu: consead
2001bhu: I spelled that wrong
2001bhu: this topic sucks

Return To Top | Speak Round
2001bhu2001bhu (PRO)
Radio should have to because 
a) they will get more listeners thus more money
b) people will like their station more
c) more diverse music will create a more diverse area 

Return To Top | Posted:
2015-04-22 03:51:50
| Speak Round
ButterCatxButterCatx (CON)
Many stations play specific types of music and native music would mess that up. Many Stations don't even play music such as NPR, would you also make them play that music. In the United States there is the freedom of Press which ensures that the government cannot interfere with press, which includes radio stations.  Playing a certain type of music will not attract more listeners, it may drive away more listeners who do not like native music. The type of music played on a radio station will not affect the diversity of the area that it is in.

Source:
The United States Constitution(first amendment)

Return To Top | Posted:
2015-04-22 06:45:00
| Speak Round
ButterCatxButterCatx (CON)
As I am the only on who actually made sensible arguments I do suggest  that you vote con. Also bhu compared himself to a cat which is highly illogical given that I am the cat in this debate.
Return To Top | Posted:
2015-04-30 01:22:18
| Speak Round
ButterCatxButterCatx (CON)
As my opponent has posted nothing relating to the debate, I will take that as a concession. Vote Con
Return To Top | Posted:
2015-05-07 03:18:54
| Speak Round
ButterCatxButterCatx (CON)
As my opponent has said nothing relating to the debate, I will take that as a forfeit. Vote Con! (He also lied, he hates sols)
Return To Top | Posted:
2015-05-14 04:57:58
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
ButterCatxButterCatx
bhu messaged me a while back and he said it was first round acceptance. Next debate I guess it won't be.
Posted 2015-04-21 08:48:31
BlackflagBlackflag
Never on edeb8
Posted 2015-04-21 08:39:35
ButterCatxButterCatx
Is it first round acceptance
Posted 2015-04-15 03:43:52
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2015-05-26 02:33:07
RXR.Judge: RXR.
Win awarded to: ButterCatx
Reasoning:
The only person in this debate that has sensible debates.
1 user rated this judgement as exceptional
0 comments on this judgement
2015-05-26 21:28:44
lannan13Judge: lannan13    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: ButterCatx
Reasoning:
Pro conceeded.
0 comments on this judgement
2015-05-26 23:48:16
nzlockieJudge: nzlockie    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: ButterCatx
2015-05-27 00:27:54
adminJudge: admin    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: ButterCatx
2015-05-27 04:02:27
RagnarJudge: Ragnar
Win awarded to: ButterCatx
Reasoning:
Pretty firm no contest on this, as con literally schooled pro.

Feedback:
I'm guessing this was one of those secret debate topics, but seriously?

R1: Both accept the debate. You have both already accepted the debate, there is no need to spend an extra round reminding the audience of such. For example, the second line in the cross examination would have been an ideal opening argument; but it did not feel like cross examination.

R2: Pro, all three of your points were base assertions. Yet if expanded the third, you could have turned it into a real argument. Con, nice argument (even if NPR is a rare radio station that does play a certain percentage of native music; as opposed to no music which you stated). Also great advice you offered to pro in the cross examination, which caused the above comment about you schooling him.

R3: This onward has almost nothing of merit.
1 comment on this judgement
ButterCatxButterCatx
Thanks, NPR is a great station, do you listen to it as well?
Posted 2015-05-27 05:15:22

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 5 rounds
  • 10000 characters per round
  • Reply speeches
  • Uses cross-examination
  • Community Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds means forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Rated debate
  • Time to post: 1 week
  • Time to vote: 3 days
  • Time to prepare: None
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29