EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
254

That we should ban all advertising which implies that addictive substances cannot be enjoyable

(PRO)
0 points
(CON)
WINNER!
1 point
adminadmin (CON)
So, I am saying that we should not ban all advertising which implies addictive substances cannot be enjoyable. Just to be clear, this means I am defending the status quo - an advertisement is allowed to say addictive substances can be enjoyable.

My opponent is proposing this topic. The burden of proof rests on them to say why I am wrong.

Briefly put, my case is that free speech is a good idea. It allows us to make claims and test those claims in the court of public opinion. Should addictive substances be enjoyable, then I propose it be allowed to advertise that fact. After all, net enjoyment would likely increase as a result.

For example, I love my chocolate milk. I'm totally addicted to it. I should be allowed to point that out.

Even if I wasn't because addiction was somehow a bad thing, then the inability to advertise my enjoyment of chocolate milk in connection with an addictive product stigmatizes millions of happy chocolate milk drinkers and prevents us from getting the help we apparently need. It also means we have less conversation around addiction generally, such as humanity's chronic addictions to disease and poison-carrying substances such as air and water.

The resolution is negated.

Return To Top | Posted:
2020-01-10 13:32:49
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
GuitarKirbyGuitarKirby
Boo, indeed.
Posted 2020-01-26 18:41:22
dpowell3543dpowell3543
Well, it seems some people are trying to keep it alive.
Posted 2020-01-19 05:47:33
adminadmin
@crossed I like to think it's not dead.
Posted 2020-01-06 07:47:32
crossedcrossed
Is this site alive
Posted 2020-01-06 05:36:50
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2020-01-31 08:22:44
dpowell3543Judge: dpowell3543    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: admin
Reasoning:
The victory goes to Con due to pro's total forfeiture.
0 comments on this judgement

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 4 rounds
  • 4000 characters per round
  • No reply speeches
  • Uses cross-examination
  • Permissive Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Unrated debate
  • Time to post: 3 days
  • Time to vote: 3 days
  • Time to prepare: None
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29