EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
594

That there should be no legislative controls on gun ownership

(CON)
WINNER!
4 points
Nick The Science GuyNick The Science Guy (PRO)
The second amendment secures the right to bear arms. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," is a justification clause, and "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," is an operative clause, meaning what is being secured. In the second amendment, the right to bear arms is the right being secured.
Return To Top | Posted:
2017-11-15 17:20:42
| Speak Round
MharmanMharman (CON)
Citizens do have the right to bear arms. That is true. However, it would be chaotic to have no control whatsoever. The position I am arguing for is minimal gun control. For example, it is gun control to ban military assault rifles, or machine guns. However, the citizens still have arms they are entitled to., such as various pistols, shotguns, and rifles. 

The point is that if we allow for citizens to have military arms, then it would spell catastrophe.

Return To Top | Posted:
2017-11-18 22:20:15
| Speak Round
MharmanMharman (CON)
My opponent has failed to rebut. I extend all points. If he forfeits this next one, I win.
Return To Top | Posted:
2017-11-24 14:28:33
| Speak Round


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2017-12-14 01:52:45
Reynold JupudiJudge: Reynold Jupudi
Win awarded to: Mharman
2017-12-11 20:11:57
MeshhJudge: Meshh
Win awarded to: Nick The Science Guy
Reasoning:
Nick The Science Guy has obviously won this debate because his opponent, Mharman was unable to rebut against his arguments and the eMate ended with an initial forfeit from Mharman and following forfeits from both groups.
2 users rated this judgement as a vote bomb
0 comments on this judgement
2017-12-04 17:38:12
adminJudge: admin    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: Mharman
2017-12-09 17:08:46
angsonamJudge: angsonam
Win awarded to: Mharman
2017-12-24 11:58:32
AnonymousJudge: Anonymous
Win awarded to: Mharman
Reasoning:
The pro debater has spoken a point and a supporting argument. The con debate has told two points and with a supporitive opinion.

Feedback:
Pro debater
Ethic:5
Critical thinking:8
Delivery:10
Total:22/30

Con debator
Critical Thinking:10
Delivery:8
Ethic:5
Total:22/30

Nice one. No one round surrender, Appreciated.
0 comments on this judgement

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 5 rounds
  • 8000 characters per round
  • Reply speeches
  • No cross-examination
  • Permissive Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Rated debate
  • Time to post: 5 days
  • Time to vote: 3 weeks
  • Time to prepare: None
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29