EDEB8 - Ultimate Online Debating
About Us   Debate    Judge   Forum
Views:
988

That poachers who kill endangered animals should be tried for murder

(PRO)
WINNER!
5 points
(CON)
1 point


View As PDF

Enjoyed this debate? Please share it!

You need to be logged in to be able to comment
The judging period on this debate is over

Previous Judgments

2016-06-02 04:39:52
adminJudge: admin    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: troy23
2016-06-03 17:06:25
NathanAllenJudge: NathanAllen
Win awarded to: troy23
2016-06-03 17:07:41
Bi0HazardJudge: Bi0Hazard    TOP JUDGE
Win awarded to: troy23
2016-06-04 17:15:42
CrimsonJudge: Crimson
Win awarded to: troy23
2016-06-04 22:48:14
CrowJudge: Crow
Win awarded to: gavstone21
Reasoning:
Neither side did anything, but when the affirmative acts smug and cocky in a formal debate, it actually convinces me not to listen to whatever this guy says.


2 users rated this judgement as good
0 comments on this judgement
2016-06-07 03:29:14
scylenderJudge: scylender
Win awarded to: troy23
Reasoning:
I am voting for trob because, even though he gave a farily smug claim, he was expecting a real debate.
0 comments on this judgement

Rules of the debate

  • Text debate
  • Individual debate
  • 3 rounds
  • 8000 characters per round
  • No reply speeches
  • No cross-examination
  • Community Judging Standard (notes)
  • Forfeiting rounds does not mean forfeiting the debate
  • Images allowed
  • HTML formatting allowed
  • Unrated debate
  • Time to post: 1 day
  • Time to vote: 1 week
  • Time to prepare: None
This is a random challenge. See the general rules for random challenges at http://www.edeb8.com/resources/General+rules+for+random+debates+%28version+2%29